3 ms·
We've seen (+, and) multiply (that's just standard multiplication) and (xor, and) multiply ('carryless multiply'); it would be interesting to see a carryless mu
by moonchild 3y ago
We've seen (+, and) multiply (that's just standard multiplication) and (xor, and) multiply ('carryless multiply'); it would be interesting to see a carryless multiply where both combining functions are user-controllable. (See also: <https://twitter.com/moon_chilled/status/1639829366304821249 https://twitter.com/moon_chilled/status/1639829366304821249>; I forget why this works, though.)
- RaisingSpear 3y agoYou might find this post interesting: https://bitmath.blogspot.com/2023/05/grevmul.html https://bitmath.blogspot.com/2023/05/grevmul.html