2 ms·
That’s true, although I wasn’t sure if simpler approaches using let bindings like that would fall under the author’s “without passing in a function to itself.”
by tshaddox 3y ago
That’s true, although I wasn’t sure if simpler approaches using let bindings like that would fall under the author’s “without passing in a function to itself.”
- Joker_vD 3y agoI understood that passage as "our let won't be letrec, so no recursion for you (unless you do some self-passing trick, of course)".