3 ms·
I've only used Redis a bit, and memcached not at all yet. But sometimes the superior alternative might lose out simply due to bad luck. I.e. that Redis gained t
by codetrotter 3y ago
I've only used Redis a bit, and memcached not at all yet. But sometimes the superior alternative might lose out simply due to bad luck. I.e. that Redis gained traction and that was it. Or perhaps getting started with Redis is more easy/straight forward than memcached and that's why.
Or it could be any of the features that Redis has which memcached does not that contributed to this outcome.
- miohtama 3y ago- Redis offer much richer set of commands than memcached, making it easy to integrate - Redis documentation is very good, likely leading to more adoption - Most applications are not performance limited, but developer resource limited, making performance considerations secondary