4 ms·
Not quite. It's more like: You're not intelligent if you think an NDA is worth a damn (as the article shows.)
by jpdoctor 15y ago
Not quite. It's more like: You're not intelligent if you think an NDA is worth a damn (as the article shows.)
- cturner 15y agoWhen good people sign a NDA it counts for something. When you're dealing with lying buggers though, it represents an option to sue. Insurance is similar.
- S4M 15y agoYeah, except when you are not in position to enforce the NDA which was the case of the OP.
- jacques_chester 15y agoMany lawyers will take cases on contingency. ie, they'll work for a percentage of any payout.
- nknight 15y agoYes, but that doesn't always help. If your opponent is rich, they can hire an army of lawyers, and you'll generally need a correspondingly huge law firm prepared to invest their own time and money in countering that. The kind of law firms we're talking about are both few in number, and generally fully-engaged by well-paying clients -- clients like your rich opponent. The incentive to take on a case like this is pretty limited.
- vlisivka 15y agoArmy of lawyers may cost much more than NDA. :-)