4 ms·

I'm surprised you had such a negative reaction to the Hindi accent! To me, it was no more difficult to understand than my colleagues who speak English as a seco

I'm surprised you had such a negative reaction to the Hindi accent! To me, it was no more difficult to understand than my colleagues who speak English as a second language. To me, this is a style choice for the demo. Not evidence that they "fucked" it up. Accents are common - everyone has one! It's nice to see the model can support your personal voice even if it's not completely neutral English.

sangnoir 3y ago
> It's nice to see the model can support your personal voice even if it's not completely neutral English There is no such thing as "neutral" English.
- pixl97 3y ago
  >Nonetheless, a form of speech known to linguists as General American is perceived by many Americans to be "accent-less", meaning a person who speaks in such a manner does not appear to be from anywhere in particular. The region of the United States that most resembles this is the central Midwest, specifically eastern Nebraska (including Omaha and Lincoln), southern and central Iowa (including Des Moines), parts of Missouri, Indiana, Ohio and western Illinois (including Peoria and the Quad Cities, but not the Chicago area).
  - sangnoir 3y ago
    > Nonetheless, a form of speech known to linguists as General American is perceived by many Americans to be "accent-less" TLDR: "neutral English" is like "neutral water temperature" - it feels neither hot not cold because it matches ones body temperature. It's subjective, and terming it "temperatureless water" is even less accurate. I'd put emphasis on "perceived" and "American" in that statement, and also note that this is limited to regional accents: General American is unambiguously American. Similar to General American, many countries have developed a "Newscaster" accent, e.g. Received Pronunciation for Britain, but it's not considered neutral as it is the "upper class" accent. In every language I've known well enough to distinguish accents, I've realized newscasters adopt a distinct accent/cadence that's not commonly used. But I wouldn't call it "accentless" - it's just another accent that may/may not have evolved from a culturally dominant regional accent (or dominant figure from a specific region.)

sangnoir 3y ago

> It's nice to see the model can support your personal voice even if it's not completely neutral English There is no such thing as "neutral" English.

pixl97 3y ago
>Nonetheless, a form of speech known to linguists as General American is perceived by many Americans to be "accent-less", meaning a person who speaks in such a manner does not appear to be from anywhere in particular. The region of the United States that most resembles this is the central Midwest, specifically eastern Nebraska (including Omaha and Lincoln), southern and central Iowa (including Des Moines), parts of Missouri, Indiana, Ohio and western Illinois (including Peoria and the Quad Cities, but not the Chicago area).
- sangnoir 3y ago
  > Nonetheless, a form of speech known to linguists as General American is perceived by many Americans to be "accent-less" TLDR: "neutral English" is like "neutral water temperature" - it feels neither hot not cold because it matches ones body temperature. It's subjective, and terming it "temperatureless water" is even less accurate. I'd put emphasis on "perceived" and "American" in that statement, and also note that this is limited to regional accents: General American is unambiguously American. Similar to General American, many countries have developed a "Newscaster" accent, e.g. Received Pronunciation for Britain, but it's not considered neutral as it is the "upper class" accent. In every language I've known well enough to distinguish accents, I've realized newscasters adopt a distinct accent/cadence that's not commonly used. But I wouldn't call it "accentless" - it's just another accent that may/may not have evolved from a culturally dominant regional accent (or dominant figure from a specific region.)