3 ms·
Yeah there must be a reason why „nobody“ is using Cutter, interested in that as well.
by 36933 3y ago
Yeah there must be a reason why „nobody“ is using Cutter, interested in that as well.
- c-c-c-c-c 3y agoProbably because noone wants to user rizin when you can use radare2. :-)
- MuffinFlavored 3y agoWhat about x64dbg? Is that considered the standard on Windows?
- _benj 3y agoI'm still fuzzy on the difference between the two, would you mind to elaborate?
- xvilka 3y agoThere are many different technical differences that accumulated over time - we save projects as a state snapshot, not a sequence of commands[1], we save types as semantically connected structures in a database that is guaranteed to be consistent[2], use better stack tracking for arguments and variables[3], not SP/BP/whatever, slowly migrate to a new generation of IL - RzIL instead of ESIL[4], provide standard libraries signatures out of the box in the FLIRT format[5], switched to a new way of parsing and processing commands[6], provide basefind, and many other small differences. [1] https://rizin.re/posts/introducing-projects/ https://rizin.re/posts/introducing-projects/ [2] https://github.com/rizinorg/rizin/tree/dev/librz/type https://github.com/rizinorg/rizin/tree/dev/librz/type [3] https://github.com/rizinorg/rizin/releases/tag/v0.5.0 https://github.com/rizinorg/rizin/releases/tag/v0.5.0 [4] https://github.com/rizinorg/rizin/blob/dev/doc/rzil.md https://github.com/rizinorg/rizin/blob/dev/doc/rzil.md [5] https://github.com/rizinorg/sigdb https://github.com/rizinorg/sigdb [6] https://rizin.re/posts/rzshell/ https://rizin.re/posts/rzshell/
- saagarjha 3y agoOther options are typically more fully-baked and conventional.