3 ms·

As does Oracle, and others. I'm aware. IPC, to me, includes the conventional shared memory resources (memory segments, locks, semaphores, condition variable,

As does Oracle, and others. I'm aware. IPC, to me, includes the conventional shared memory resources (memory segments, locks, semaphores, condition variable, etc.) used by these systems: resources acquired by processes for the purpose of communication with other processes. I get it though. The most general concept of shared memory is not coupled to an OS "process." You made me question whether my concept of term IPC was valid, however. So what does one do when a question appears? Stop thinking immediately and consult a language model! Q: Is shared memory considered a form of interprocess communication? GPT-4: Yes, shared memory is indeed considered a form of interprocess communication (IPC). It's one of the several mechanisms provided by an operating system to allow processes to share and exchange data. ... Why does citing ChatGPT make me feel so ugly inside?

TeMPOraL 3y ago
I always understood IPC, "interprocess communication", in general sense, as anything and everything that can be used by processes to communicate with each other - of course with a narrowing provision that common use of the term refers to those means that are typically used for that purpose, are relatively efficient, and the process in question run on the same machine. In that view, I always saw shared memory as IPC, in that it is a tool commonly used to exchange data between processes, but of course it is not strictly tied to any process in particular. This is similar to files, which if you squint are a form of IPC too, and are also not tied to any specific process. > Why does citing ChatGPT make me feel so ugly inside? That's probably because, in cases like this, it's not much different to stating it yourself, but is more noisy.
faangsticle 3y ago
> Why does citing ChatGPT make me feel so ugly inside? Its the modern let me Google that for you. Just like people don't care what the #1 result on Google is, they also don't care what ChatGPT has to say about it. If they did, they'd ask it themselves.
pritambarhate 3y ago
Without a credible source to reconfirm what ChatGPT said, one can’t really assume what ChatGPT says is correct.

TeMPOraL 3y ago

I always understood IPC, "interprocess communication", in general sense, as anything and everything that can be used by processes to communicate with each other - of course with a narrowing provision that common use of the term refers to those means that are typically used for that purpose, are relatively efficient, and the process in question run on the same machine. In that view, I always saw shared memory as IPC, in that it is a tool commonly used to exchange data between processes, but of course it is not strictly tied to any process in particular. This is similar to files, which if you squint are a form of IPC too, and are also not tied to any specific process. > Why does citing ChatGPT make me feel so ugly inside? That's probably because, in cases like this, it's not much different to stating it yourself, but is more noisy.

faangsticle 3y ago

> Why does citing ChatGPT make me feel so ugly inside? Its the modern let me Google that for you. Just like people don't care what the #1 result on Google is, they also don't care what ChatGPT has to say about it. If they did, they'd ask it themselves.

pritambarhate 3y ago

Without a credible source to reconfirm what ChatGPT said, one can’t really assume what ChatGPT says is correct.