2 ms·
No. For the simple reason that there are both legitimate investigative drugs and treatments, and there are quacks and hucksters preying on the desperate. Your
by Zigurd 3y ago
No. For the simple reason that there are both legitimate investigative drugs and treatments, and there are quacks and hucksters preying on the desperate.
Your body is not your choice when it gives quacks publicity, never mind revenue, to victimize others and spread disinformation.
There is a lot to be dissatisfied with re conventional pharma and medical practice. But opening the door to cranks is not an improvement. You might be asking "How can you tell which is which?" One of these has publications, has trials planned, etc. The other has the usual signs of quackery.