> Ye well if you can't go pee at will a mandated brake every 4 hours won't save you underwear. So to sum up. - Demanding a water break every four hours is us

> Ye well if you can't go pee at will a mandated brake every 4 hours won't save you underwear. So to sum up. - Demanding a water break every four hours is useless because you need to drink every 15 minutes in this context - Demanding a pee break every four hours is useless because… everyone has tiny bladders, I guess? This little pitiful rule is not better than having to go whole shifts without being able to pee? I guess mandated lunch breaks are useless as well since you need to eat every hour at least under such strenuous conditions. Bah. > But I am all for a loose enough "right to pee and drink" law if it is a practical problem at some employers. It certainly must be “loose enough”. Thou shalt never inconvenience corporate management.