3 ms·

> Reducing headcount by 85% and still getting far more done? “Reducing headcount by 85%” is a glib way to describe what happened. There’s a reason that over 1

> Reducing headcount by 85% and still getting far more done? “Reducing headcount by 85%” is a glib way to describe what happened. There’s a reason that over 1 in every 4 of those former employees is filing an arbitration claim!

sauel 3y ago
And what is that reason? That they are entitled to a job at a company where 85% of people are redundant?
- floren 3y ago
  Don't be obtuse -- they are filing a claim because they did not receive the severance they were contractually due.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]