4 ms·
The biting antagonism of your message's tone undermines it's content. Even so you've chosen to die on a strange hill. What you seem to be arguing for is condit
by blechinger 3y ago
The biting antagonism of your message's tone undermines it's content.
Even so you've chosen to die on a strange hill. What you seem to be arguing for is conditional on how "money to to continue" is understood in this context. While I believe I understand your point: it's moot. A continuation has occurred. A continuation is occuring. If your assertions were correct that would not be possible.
- cxr 3y agoWhose strange hill are we talking about? > A continuation has occurred. A continuation is occuring. If your assertions were correct that would not be possible. Again, wrong. I'm pretty well-acquainted with what I said. Go reply (antagonistically) to someone whose remarks actually contain the defects you so badly wish mine contained (to the point that you're willing to ignore what I've actually written and substitute whatever it is you're imagining me to have said in its place).
- immanentize 3y agoYou can reason perfectly and still be wrong - because you have applied the logic wrong in some way.
- cxr 3y agoThat's a true statement. It, like other statements that have been made in this cursed thread, isn't something that moves the needle on whether what I said is actually wrong or not, though... But it is a true statement!