3 ms·
Regarding Homejoy, this article [0] that didn't get much traction at the time but lays out the best theory about their failure. I was working at its competitor
by aleyan 3y ago
Regarding Homejoy, this article [0] that didn't get much traction at the time but lays out the best theory about their failure.
I was working at its competitor Handy then and it was clear that the dealsite method of customer acquisition was non sustainable. At the time Groupon was super popular. It worked like this: a service provider eg Homejoy would sell a coupon through Groupon for $50 for a "regular" $100 service, $25 would go to Groupon and $25 to Homejoy, Homejoy would also pay $45 to $60 to the cleaner. This made sense for some business like a spa that after getting the customer in the door might upsell a $100 massage (and get 100% of that). It did not work with Homejoy because customers who got a deep discount on a cleaning did not retain and did not get upsold to. Since Homejoy had to pay the cleaner, they would loose $20+ on each such "acquired" customer. LTV was negative.
On top of this, Homejoy needed to raise funds and for that you need to show customer growth. If you spent $1000 to acquire 50 customers one month and none of them retained, you need to spend $1200 to acquire 60 customers the next month, or you won't have growth to show investors. Homejoy needed to spend more and more each month or it wouldn't get its next funding round; which it didn't. I don't know but I believe that Homejoy collapsed at its largest size with the peak number of monthly customers.
Other cited reasons for Homejoy's failure like worker classification lawsuits and worker retention are unlikely to have been the real reasons behind its collapse. Handy would have had the same issues and yet they are still going 7 years later as part of Angie's List with little noise.
[0] https://www.forbes.com/sites/ellenhuet/2015/07/23/what-really-killed-homejoy-it-couldnt-hold-onto-its-customers/?sh=540811431874 https://www.forbes.com/sites/ellenhuet/2015/07/23/what-reall...
- monero-xmr 3y agoI think a major problem is the cleaners are very easy to go direct. All that work to recruit cleaners, acquire customers, and then they hand out a business card and the middleman is cut out.
- aleyan 3y agoIf you get a cleaner you like, your best bet is to get their contact info and book directly with them. It will be cheaper than going through the platform, you will get exactly the cleaner you want and you will get a better service. This disintermediation was a worry, but I don't think this happened frequently enough the justify the fear. It was hard to discern how much this was happening from the data; anecdotally it was rare.
- IgorPartola 3y agoThe best quote I read on HN (and am paraphrasing now) is that a lot of these venture capital backed startups are in the business of selling dollar bills for 90 cents.
- hotpotamus 3y agoThe joke that long predates me is, "yeah, but we'll make it up in volume" - it's hardly a new innovation of VC.
- monero-xmr 3y agoThe major innovation of VC is high amounts of capital being made available for business experiments. Before VC it was a small time entrepreneurs scraping to make something that could sustain itself, or new business models funded by existing large corporations that could siphon off some money for experiments. VC enabled big money on truly crazy ideas. VC will continue to exist but entrepreneurs will be far more focused on earning revenue ASAP. You can’t rely on easy money continuing for each round based on your name and connections.