4 ms·

Well I suppose its for the same reason why the women in the article also didn't have the men in their lives mentioned/named Or did you not read past the first

• willcipriano 3y ago
  Everyone knows a man can get a woman pregnant at 51, what would be surprising is a woman having a successful pregnancy without complications at that age. If that's what happened why not include it, if not and she was younger, I fear women make takeaway a false message here.
  • deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
• scarface_74 3y ago
  Yes but there is a real biological timeline for having children that is different between men and women.
• ohthatsnotright 3y ago
  I imagine they were more interested in the age of the partner as men can produce offspring until very late in their life (see Al Pacino for a recent example) whereas women do undergo some physical changes that make them incapable after a certain age. If it was a 51 year old man but a 20 year old woman, that's a very different story than both of them being well over 40.