3 ms·
If you don't intend to enforce the terms of GPL against people who borrow parts of your code, it is really not that harmful.. but it would be unnecessarily ambi
by elif 3y ago
If you don't intend to enforce the terms of GPL against people who borrow parts of your code, it is really not that harmful.. but it would be unnecessarily ambiguous why it would be licenced that way rather than MIT/apache/etc permissible license at that point. Like 'i don't intend to shoot you I just want my pistol loaded and in my hand'
- bombolo 3y agoGPT violates MIT licensed software as well. There is a requirement to carry a copyright notice, which GPT/copilot ignore. So you're not violating only GPL licensed code, but also MIT. You need something that gives more permissions.