2 ms·

There is literally an example for using destructuring in the linked article. So it is supported.

• ojintoad 3y ago
  Can you clarify where it indicates it's supported i.e. which specific example? I re read and didn't see it myself, seems others are missing it. To be fair I don't see it not being supported either by the examples.
  • masklinn 3y ago
    The last example: { await using { connection } = getConnection(); // Do stuff with connection } // Automatically closed! edit: according to the ES proposal issues, this might be something that doesn't actually exist, on purpose (it's rather ambiguous as to what will be disposed of): https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management/issues/78#issuecomment-1135152072 https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen...
    • ojintoad 3y ago
      Thanks! Yes that example is subtly different. I did also click through to the proposal but didn't see that issue. It does seem like it's still unclear what's intentional or not.
      • pwdisswordfishc 3y ago
        It’s intentional. The grammar production in the proposal is parametrized as ~Pattern (a parameter introduced in the proposal), which means it does not allow destructuring. https://tc39.es/proposal-explicit-resource-management/#prod-UsingDeclaration https://tc39.es/proposal-explicit-resource-management/#prod-...