even there, the monopoly on both these things is mighty narrow. For example, how many political scientists would say that the state should have such a monopoly

even there, the monopoly on both these things is mighty narrow. For example, how many political scientists would say that the state should have such a monopoly on violence that there should be no recognition of a right to defend oneself and others? However international informent asset management? Does it impinge on the government's necessary monopoly on national security and violence? Two for two, I'd wager.....