> the published source had known bugs and was not updated for months That's the server code, not the client code. > the article does address the verifiable bu

> the published source had known bugs and was not updated for months That's the server code, not the client code. > the article does address the verifiable builds point, pointing out that it doesn't and can't really work IIRC (the article is now down for me for some reason), the author was again talking about server code.