> Again: obviously, there's a counterpoint that people shouldn't have to hire lawyers to keep their cash, I get it. Given this, I don't understand the point of

> Again: obviously, there's a counterpoint that people shouldn't have to hire lawyers to keep their cash, I get it. Given this, I don't understand the point of the rest of your post. The cop suspects he might commit a crime in the future, but there is no evidence of a crime being committed. It should just end right there.