3 ms·
There's still the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable search and seizures, which seems like it gives grounds here.
by sokoloff 3y ago
There's still the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable search and seizures, which seems like it gives grounds here.
- yieldcrv 3y agodrivers either allow the search "I have nothing to hide", or the drug dog gives a false positive for probable cause the police aren't skipping these procedures
- sokoloff 3y agoThe seizure part is more relevant here.
- yieldcrv 3y agoOkay. Well look at the current case law. The courts are not in a place to invalidate existing laws, so the legislatures are required to change those laws. Or a clarifying constitutional amendment is required. If you can think of a shortcut nobody else thought of then go for it.
- UncleMeat 3y agoSadly, a nontrivial portion of the scotus doesn’t give a shit about the 4th and will happily let police steal from people because drugs.