4 ms·
> Taking the example from the OP, do you really think it would be better to slowly come to agreement over 12 meetings or to have some more senior person say a f
by adamnemecek 3y ago
> Taking the example from the OP, do you really think it would be better to slowly come to agreement over 12 meetings or to have some more senior person say a few words to skip the ego soothing or whatever in those meetings?
That's not the opposite though.
- dan-robertson 3y agoI don’t understand what you mean. Did I do a bad job of representing the scenario in the original article? Those were the outcomes from the article as I understood it, where one is caused by ‘try to do it by yourself’ and the other by ‘get help’.
- adamnemecek 3y agoTaking time to do things right is not the same as more meetings with more stakeholders.
- dan-robertson 3y agoSure, but I’m not asking about a situation where the choice is between right and fast. The choice I’m intermediated in is the one between ‘right and fast’ and ‘right and slow’. I wish that you would clearly write down what your actual opinion is instead of riddles. My actual opinion is that ‘right and fast’ is obviously better than ‘right and slow’ (with other things like hours worked kept equal). It seemed to me that the GP’s comment was implying something close to the opposite and I was curious for more details.