3 ms·
Stock price increase benefits workers quite a bit though.
by VirusNewbie 3y ago
Stock price increase benefits workers quite a bit though.
- ethbr0 3y agoAssuming workers own stock.
- VirusNewbie 3y agoWe are talking about Twilio specifically.
- kelnos 3y agoWhich they do. Twilio's equity comp was fairly generous, at least for a time, and I believe all employees had equity as some percentage of their compensation. In addition, Twilio offered an ESPP that all employees could take advantage of. (Full disclosure: former Twilio employee and current Twilio stockholder.)
- makeitdouble 3y agoStock holder =/= worker
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- tick_tock_tick 3y agoMaybe sometimes that's true but at Twilio all employee's are stock holders.
- makeitdouble 3y agoThanks ! I didn't know, and apparently yes, Twillio employees get RSU at entry as a standard perk. Now, those are still just RSU. I couldn't get an exact number but if they are in line with most other companies, the stock raising while hypothetically the employee compensation goes down the drain would still a net negative for employees.
- friendzis 3y agoNo, just no. Capital extraction, be it dividend payout or stock buybacks, benefit existing stockholders, by definition. Stock buybacks, however, as opposed to dividend payout, in a free-ish market increase stock price, which prevents those with less free capital from being stockholders in the first place, which, under capitalist system, are the workers. Stock buybacks benefit those with previously free capital while at the same time hurting those without free capital currently. In a capitalist system this does hurt workers quite a bit.
- jezzamon 3y agoAm I missing something in your argument? Are you saying the price of an individual stock is what's pricing people out? Having trouble reconciling that with the fact that only a few stocks are above $1000 (which doesn't seem to hard to reach if you want any substantial savings), and then stock splits and fractional shares happen often. Or are you just saying that they will own a smaller percent of the total stock, so they have less say as stockholders?