2 ms·
Perhaps followed by progressively higher tax rates on subsequent books and apples?
by davidrupp 3y ago
Perhaps followed by progressively higher tax rates on subsequent books and apples?
- henry2023 3y agoIf Apples were: 1. Essential to live 2. Considered a human right 3. Not accessible to >90% of the next generation 4. Being hoarded Yeah, fast progressively higher tax rates based on the number of apples you own would be perfectly reasonable.
- davidrupp 3y agoOkay. [citation needed] on all of the above.
- genocidicbunny 3y ago1 is pretty easy to experimentally deduce -- simply go live outdoors wherever you are. Skip the tent, that's housing too. Just make yourself a little bedding spot in a tree somewhere like our ancestors did. Pretty sure in most of the world, you wouldn't last long without some form of shelter or housing.
- davidrupp 3y agoWho is the number one “hoarder” of houses in the U.S.? When I bought my house, all I had to deal with (as far as I know) was the bank and the prior owner, who seemed happy to sell.
- kbelder 3y ago>If Apples were: 1. Essential to live 2. Considered a human right 3. Not accessible to >90% of the next generation 90% of the next generation is going to die from homelessness?
- tester457 3y agoInstead of progressively make the tax rate a sigmoid growth curve with a long lag phase so no one monopolizes apples and books.