4 ms·
You've missed my point with both parts of your post, alas. I am not talking about guaranteed success, but about people who don't try the avenues that are avail
by xyzelement 3y ago
You've missed my point with both parts of your post, alas.
I am not talking about guaranteed success, but about people who don't try the avenues that are available to them.
Like if you are a deer and your family is getting killed by cars, have you tried not standing in the damn road?
I know so many people who have an obvious next action available that would leave them no worse and likely better, but they don't try it.
Which brings me to the second part of your post. What have you tried that could potentially lead you to be less irritating to women? Or at least, what could you try? I could come up with a list of 5+ things for you right now and I don't even know you.
- Paul-Craft 3y ago> I know so many people who have an obvious next action available that would leave them no worse and likely better, but they don't try it. Obvious to you, perhaps. But, who says it's obvious to them?
- xyzelement 3y ago... even when told.
- TeMPOraL 3y agoThat's GP's point, I suppose - that people may have plenty of good moves available, but they've also built up near-instinctive defenses and repulsion fields around them - so even if they accidentally think or read about one of such options, they'll reject it as fast as it registers to them. It might be that the only way through those defenses is for someone else, or some situation, to force one to consider the option for a few more seconds or minutes. I know I have this problem myself - some steps seem unavailable until some third party just plain tells me, "yes, you are actually allowed to do this, and you already know nothing bad will happen".
- xyzelement 3y agoI am the GP you are referring to and - thank you for explaining my point perhaps better than I did :)