3 ms·

Hahaha. No, we use Jira Cloud, and the bills are astronomical, for still shit performance.

• Zetice 3y ago
  [flagged]
  • ohgodplsno 3y ago
    That's a lot of denial. Have you considered that Atlassian knows that these are Fortune 100 companies with contracts that would make Larry Ellison weep and therefore slap them on their biggest instances because hardware cost is negligible (as well as having dedicated employees to fix specific problems for them), and that _maybe_ the same amount of work isn't done for <generic company paying default prices for Jira Cloud>
    • deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
    • Zetice 3y ago
      Maybe! But I doubt it. I run engineering at a b2b SaaS and specifically dedicating resources the way you're describing is not something I'd consider at the level Atlassian is at, especially considering there are people like you lurking out there.
  • widerporst 3y ago
    It's not the network that's the bottleneck, but the Javascript-bloated mess of the frontend. edit: That isn't to say that Jira and Confluence are the only offenders. They aren't even the worst. Slack/Teams/Rocket.Chat are all just as bad and make me consider switching to a career without computers on a regular basis.
    • deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
    • Zetice 3y ago
      That’s kind of my point; all the tech you list here doesn’t have horrible lag, and aren’t generally even close to so bad they’d make someone want to switch careers. So if it’s not them…