6 ms·
I’d argue those cities in the east coast you mention are closer together and more densely populated. If you were to look at the northeast region by itself (Bost
by gfiorav 3y ago
I’d argue those cities in the east coast you mention are closer together and more densely populated. If you were to look at the northeast region by itself (Boston, New York, Washington), I bet its rail is comparable to similar European countries.
- kdmccormick 3y agoEach city has a decent metro rail system but definitely not up to western European standards. Boston's in particular is woefully in need of maintenance despite its importance in the city. The rail connecting tbe cities is not very good. It costs upwards of $100 for a BOS->DC ticket and takes a day of travel.
- rainsford 3y agoI believe you're right that the US northeast is denser than many European countries, but the rail definitely isn't as good. The only "high-speed" rail line is the Acela, which is slow and expensive. Other rail options are even slower, not all that cheap either, and not very reliable. Compared to the rest of the US, northeast transit is better, but that's a pretty low bar.