It’s funny to me that you write this down and not be reflective about your own claims. I don’t buy the quasi-scientific part about evolutionary reasons. Ad fo

It’s funny to me that you write this down and not be reflective about your own claims. I don’t buy the quasi-scientific part about evolutionary reasons. Ad for that matter, I don’t even buy your first claim, that people don’t want to think independently. But it doesn’t matter in the end, the whole point of the article - to me at least - is that it’s a good thing to always take the time and at least understand the reasons for choices, and challenge them if it makes sense to do so. If I allow myself a wild stab at things, I think it’s more that people are “trusting” by nature and assume that things are well thought-out, which the article points out.