4 ms·
It's not a weird summary at all... contrary to some people's views, the federal government actually does have constraints placed on its actions. At the very le
by shrubble 3y ago
It's not a weird summary at all... contrary to some people's views, the federal government actually does have constraints placed on its actions.
At the very least it's a civil action called 'tortious interference'; using Federal money (employee time) wrongly might rise to the level of 'fraudulent conversion'...
- viraptor 3y agoYou haven't pointed at anything actually breaking those rules.
- shrubble 3y agoI really think you are trolling/sealioning at this point. TI is when a 3rd party interferes with a the interactions between 2 parties. In this case the feds interfered with the user's use of Twitter. The second is obvious, you spend Federal money on a wrong purpose , just like if you had employees help you remodel your house while they were supposed to be working.