4 ms·
There's an objective asymmetry to it. The person who has a flawless recording of what happened has options that the person who has a lossy recording of what hap
by cfiggers 3y ago
There's an objective asymmetry to it. The person who has a flawless recording of what happened has options that the person who has a lossy recording of what happened (i.e. the one in their head) does not have. If everyone is on the same playing field (as in, neither have a recording or both have it) then it seems to me the objection is greatly lessened—it's when one party records and the other party doesn't have access to it that there's some sense of unfairness.
- golergka 3y agoGreat. Let's break this asymmetry by making AR devices ubiquitous and giving most people those recordings. Would also help with police problems in many countries.
- cfiggers 3y agoThat definitely seems like a way to address at least this one part of what seems to bother people about omnipresent technological observation of everyone everywhere all the time, yes. :)
- JohnFen 3y agoSurveillance has already made being in public spaces unpleasant enough to prevent me from taking part in many things that I would otherwise enjoy taking part in. More of it just makes my world smaller and smaller.