3 ms·
I’d say it probably makes sense for the intended use cases; the ones they have shown in their videos. Mostly sitting on a couch, or leisurely strolling in your
by ElFitz 3y ago
I’d say it probably makes sense for the intended use cases; the ones they have shown in their videos.
Mostly sitting on a couch, or leisurely strolling in your huge, mostly empty, living room while discussing with your colleagues or family.
Instead of, say, wildly moving your arms around to slice a cube in beat saber, or shoot down a face hugger in Alyx.
The other big difference being the supposed ability to clearly see your environnement.
But then, this is all suppositions. And they have screwed up more than a few times. Wait and see, I guess.
- ChuckNorris89 3y agoThen I guess, I'm not a target customer and Apple doesn't want my money. Fair enough, more money for me for other things. Yay!
- dwaite 3y agoIndeed, taking over control of a market is more trouble than it is really worth. Apple wants alternatives. They're happy just taking the lion's share of profits.
- ChuckNorris89 3y ago>Mostly sitting on a couch, or leisurely strolling in your huge, mostly empty, living room while discussing with your colleagues or family. So, 3500$ for a VR Zoom call machine?
- ElFitz 3y ago… Yes? Considering some people’s use cases, the same could be said of a MacBook Pro or an iMac. I mean, have you seen their introduction video? [1] It’s basically watching movies on a huge screen and chatting with heads embedded in floating windows. [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TX9qSaGXFyg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TX9qSaGXFyg