3 ms·
That’s the not too comfortable part. But with a tiny bit of syntax sugar (say, a ! or ? that expands to a mini-try-catch block) it would be more than fine.
by kaba0 3y ago
That’s the not too comfortable part. But with a tiny bit of syntax sugar (say, a ! or ? that expands to a mini-try-catch block) it would be more than fine.
- The_Colonel 3y agoYes, I would be fine with a shorthand syntax like that. But it's not available which makes checked exceptions more trouble than worth.