3 ms·
It's not the idiom, it's poor structure; the object of the clause is ambiguous and could mean "responded to my writing" or "responsed to Mark Zuckerberg". E.g.
by morelisp 3y ago
It's not the idiom, it's poor structure; the object of the clause is ambiguous and could mean "responded to my writing" or "responsed to Mark Zuckerberg". E.g. "While I wrote" or "After I wrote" would remove the implication of causation that "When" has. But really it should just say "The street responded by savaging..." with no authorial preening.
That being said, it's a weird thing to get hung up on.