3 ms·
The quality of this article feels kind of dubious. There are ideas here that have some merit but some of the background smells like it was generated. That asid
by samtho 3y ago
The quality of this article feels kind of dubious. There are ideas here that have some merit but some of the background smells like it was generated.
That aside, I’m a little put off by the grouping of containers and serverless as if they exist at the same level which could warrant a coherent discussion. For example, given that serverless is simply a way to spin up on-demand, ad-hoc http endpoints, the vendor lock-in argument is going to be stronger than the same argument about an OCI spec container.
Maybe I’m in a bubble, but there isn’t much substance here that isn’t already known: using serverless as a crutch is a terrible idea if you are looking to actually scale and containers, well, exist.
- alephnerd 3y agoIt's a submarine article for Deloitte Consulting's Cloud Practice. The writer of the article is affilated them and I myself have had Content Marketing teams ghostwrite articles with my name on InfoWorld for "Demand Gen". You will see tons of "thought leadership" articles this month as June is when infrastructure, networking, and cybersecurity products are released as these releases are timed with industry conferences.