In an effort to find coming ground, I’ve found it’s better to argue the idea that humans should do everything we can to control climate. Most people I know who

In an effort to find coming ground, I’ve found it’s better to argue the idea that humans should do everything we can to control climate. Most people I know who reject the evidence of climate change seem to be into consuming and building lots of stuff, so this angle seems to appeal to that mindset. It makes me think—maybe it’s a complete waste of time to try to “convince the other side” or “change their minds”. What if instead we agree on an outcome, like complete and total control over the earths climate? Would that help getting folks to run in the same direction? If you think about it; the logical conclusion of humanity in our solar system is building a Dyson sphere around the sun and controlling climate for a huge population.