5 ms·

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" We just did not know any better (yet). 49.72% of human beings are women. Among thos

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" We just did not know any better (yet). 49.72% of human beings are women. Among those my mother and two sisters which are medical doctors. Stop blaming men for everything we did not manage to fix. Plenty of us did try. "It's better to light a candle than curse the darkness" and "Be the change you want to see in the world". As a man, I can tell you that I will personally celebrate anytime a woman joins STEM and fix/invent something new.

jelliclesfarm 3y ago
Sorry, I didn’t get your point. Are you saying that women are solely responsible for inventing ‘something new’ in healthcare as it is only used for them?
- carstenhag 3y ago
  You made a really heavy claim with "The entire field of gynecology is founded upon intentional sadistic torture of women by male physicians". The other person is saying that there are many male and female doctors. If there would be a better option, it for sure would have been made possible. It's not male gyns wanting women to suffer - this doesn't make any sense, it's only there to create hate.
  - rhaway84773 3y ago
    There “are”. But for most of medicine’s history there “weren’t”. And men were making decisions about things they simply had no idea about.
    - rangelreale 3y ago
      Using the same analogy, then all veterinarians are sadistic?
    - rowanG077 3y ago
      Your claim simply can't be explained with historical data. Women have entered the medical field for decades upon decades.
      - jelliclesfarm 3y ago
        What has advancements in medical equipment and diagnostics have to do with women studying to become physicians? Pharmacology and medical equipment is an industry. Further: [..]Historically, medical studies have excluded female participants and research data have been collected from males and generalized to females. The gender gap in medical research, alongside overarching misogyny, results in real-life disadvantages for female patients.[..] Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8909483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8909483/
        rowanG077 3y ago
        Because even in the 70s gynecologist practices were already significantly changing due to women doctors entering the field. Claiming that something so easily changed isn't done because "the entire field of gynecology is founded upon intentional sadistic torture of women by male physicians" is totally ridiculous. It's so far divorced from reality that it's lands you in troll territory.
rubyn00bie 3y ago
[flagged]
dennis_jeeves1 3y ago
[flagged]
40yearoldman 3y ago
I even more so when 99% of men don’t even know what a speculum is, or have any clue about the subject matter.
28304283409234 3y ago
There are more areas of colour between that black and white spectrum of “malice” and “ignorance”. In this case, the system favours research geared towards men, because money, because more men decided where the researchmoney is to be spent. This all has historical backgrounds that are all ver understandable. But ignorance? Malice? Both? Or something in between? Ignoring this pain is at this point certainly malicious. And I see too many comments here for comfort that are of that nature.

jelliclesfarm 3y ago

Sorry, I didn’t get your point. Are you saying that women are solely responsible for inventing ‘something new’ in healthcare as it is only used for them?

carstenhag 3y ago
You made a really heavy claim with "The entire field of gynecology is founded upon intentional sadistic torture of women by male physicians". The other person is saying that there are many male and female doctors. If there would be a better option, it for sure would have been made possible. It's not male gyns wanting women to suffer - this doesn't make any sense, it's only there to create hate.
- rhaway84773 3y ago
  There “are”. But for most of medicine’s history there “weren’t”. And men were making decisions about things they simply had no idea about.
  - rangelreale 3y ago
    Using the same analogy, then all veterinarians are sadistic?
  - rowanG077 3y ago
    Your claim simply can't be explained with historical data. Women have entered the medical field for decades upon decades.
    - jelliclesfarm 3y ago
      What has advancements in medical equipment and diagnostics have to do with women studying to become physicians? Pharmacology and medical equipment is an industry. Further: [..]Historically, medical studies have excluded female participants and research data have been collected from males and generalized to females. The gender gap in medical research, alongside overarching misogyny, results in real-life disadvantages for female patients.[..] Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8909483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8909483/
      - rowanG077 3y ago
        Because even in the 70s gynecologist practices were already significantly changing due to women doctors entering the field. Claiming that something so easily changed isn't done because "the entire field of gynecology is founded upon intentional sadistic torture of women by male physicians" is totally ridiculous. It's so far divorced from reality that it's lands you in troll territory.

rubyn00bie 3y ago

[flagged]

dennis_jeeves1 3y ago

[flagged]

40yearoldman 3y ago

I even more so when 99% of men don’t even know what a speculum is, or have any clue about the subject matter.

28304283409234 3y ago

There are more areas of colour between that black and white spectrum of “malice” and “ignorance”. In this case, the system favours research geared towards men, because money, because more men decided where the researchmoney is to be spent. This all has historical backgrounds that are all ver understandable. But ignorance? Malice? Both? Or something in between? Ignoring this pain is at this point certainly malicious. And I see too many comments here for comfort that are of that nature.