It's seems this was a garbled sentence in the first edition. Here was Graebers response: > There was a garbled sentence in the first edition that I didn't catc

It's seems this was a garbled sentence in the first edition. Here was Graebers response: > There was a garbled sentence in the first edition that I didn't catch in proofreading but was instantly removed as soon as anyone noticed it. DeLong has seized on this and endlessly reproduced it, quite possible hundreds of times, pretending it's still in the text. > Why does he do this sort of thing? I honestly have no idea. I've never seen anyone else behave remotely like it. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17250282 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17250282