6 ms·
>Their null is GPT4 can ace MIT and they haven't provided any evidence to reject. If I said "2 + 2 = 4", and then gave a flawed proof, it is not your job as a
by hex4def6 3y ago
>Their null is GPT4 can ace MIT and they haven't provided any evidence to reject.
If I said "2 + 2 = 4", and then gave a flawed proof, it is not your job as a debunker to prove that 2+2 != 4.
Their null hypothesis is that this paper provides sufficient and proper evidence to prove the original claim. And to that end, it seems like they've done a good job at pointing out enough serious deficiencies that - regardless of the original hypothesis's truth - the original paper cannot be used to prove it to be true.