No, Linq is *not* in any way like Haskell's `do`. Linq is a (reasonably) compromised, non-referentially-transparent, implementation of a restricted form of rel

No, Linq is *not* in any way like Haskell's `do`. Linq is a (reasonably) compromised, non-referentially-transparent, implementation of a restricted form of relational-algebra with side-effects permitted, so I'm not comfortable describing Linq as "monadic". Whereas Haskell's `do` is strictly monadic.