3 ms·
> Wikipedia contradicts everything you just stated. Your "refutation" is does not address any point that was made by the person you are responding to. For exam
by jandrewrogers 3y ago
> Wikipedia contradicts everything you just stated.
Your "refutation" is does not address any point that was made by the person you are responding to. For example, the vast majority of the $700B military budget is not spent on weapons, something which is easily verified. Most of it is spent on administrative costs, logistics, medical research, etc.
US weapons manufacturing is a rounding error in the US economy, easily <1%.
- Garvi 3y agoYou are correct. The 700B is mostly wages and R&D, I take it. The 100bil throws me off because knowing Germany just spent 100bil on just one order of F-35s, that are being discussed here. Not being contrarian, just making a point, I believe US weapons manufacturing being 50% of the US industry. The point being the heavy redaction of all data on this topic. "Prove me wrong"
- dmoy 3y ago> Germany just spent 100bil on just one order of F-35s, that are being discussed here. Wasn't it $10b, not $100b? Also that cost is not consistent - it'll be spread out over many years, it's likely they won't even get ten planes delivered in the next four years.