Maybe I didn't grok this article but all the examples made me think "fancyql" (as it calls it) looks a lot better than SQL. If I could compile back and forth b

Maybe I didn't grok this article but all the examples made me think "fancyql" (as it calls it) looks a lot better than SQL. If I could compile back and forth between SQL and "fancyql" then using fancyql feels like an absolute no brainer to me? I'm a lot less sympathetic to the "everyone already knows it" argument after dealing with SQL queries that are many hundred lines long.