3 ms·
> You've decided your definition, as many have. I really didn't. One of the definitive books on the DevOps ideology, _The Phoenix Project_, spends basically it
by nunez 3y ago
> You've decided your definition, as many have.
I really didn't. One of the definitive books on the DevOps ideology, _The Phoenix Project_, spends basically its entire plot driving home the point that DevOps is about dev and ops working together instead of ticket-passing.
To your point, doing this requires going back in time a bit where sysadmins used to do a little bit of software and devs had to be a little bit of a sysadmin.
(I blame Windows and the dot-com boom for the silos having been erected in the first place.)
- dijit 3y agoThen you've chosen someone elses definition but it's not the origin I'm afraid. That book (I've read it twice, I think it's the only book I read twice honestly) is about the Toyota method and Agile and now that I think about it: warns against having "super stars" who do everything; which seems to be some other folks definition of devops xD