3 ms·
If it's accurate and has higher readership, what's the harm? I found it useful. Re topics, it is a shame for the regular readers if they have limited themselve
by lozenge 3y ago
If it's accurate and has higher readership, what's the harm? I found it useful.
Re topics, it is a shame for the regular readers if they have limited themselves to the short list of high SEO performing topics. But it would be hypocritical to complain about it from a link aggregator site where the article has only reached the front page due to this choice of a popular interest topic. When did you cancel your subscription?
- madsbuch 3y ago> If it's accurate and has higher readership, what's the harm? The other commenter argued that it relies on common knowledge as opposed to scientific knowledge. That's the harm. Especially for a journal claiming to be scientific.