5 ms·
But is surprisingly good useful? Suppose you configure your inbox such that you unpredictably don't see a small percentage of important emails. Suppose you mis
by iudqnolq 3y ago
But is surprisingly good useful?
Suppose you configure your inbox such that you unpredictably don't see a small percentage of important emails. Suppose you miss an email from your boss telling you a very important client needs you to fix a critical bug today, and as a result you start working on that bug slightly later when your boss contacts you another way. Your boss might tell you to uninstall your LLM and just read all your email
- foverzar 3y agoThe same logic could be applicable to pretty much any other spam filtering mechanism.
- iudqnolq 3y agoNo, it's the same category, but the specific values makes all the difference. The logic depends on the probability of error, the predictability of error, and the social acceptability of error. By analogy it's socially more acceptable to have an outage because AWS is down than because insert_nich_provider is down even if insert_nich_provider has fewer outages. If insert_nich_provider has more outages it's even worse.