Huffman's being a dillhole, as stipulated. However, the Washington Post should know that "the landed gentry" and the aristocracy are not synonymous. Even the d

Huffman's being a dillhole, as stipulated. However, the Washington Post should know that "the landed gentry" and the aristocracy are not synonymous. Even the dictionary definition they linked to in their own article (and, by the way, it's weird that a major newspaper just links to the dictionary) says it's just someone with money and land. For example, a CEO might have a lot of money and land, and an actual Baron might not have much. Yes, it's pedantic, and yes, it's splitting hairs, there is not a whole lot to say about a story that hasn't changed much since the last story about this, except maybe that newspapers should slow down and write better stories rather than just breathlessly covering everything as quickly as possible.