> We therefore have a very good statistical basis for claiming that we have discovered a truly existing phenomenon. The only question is, *is it really the one

> We therefore have a very good statistical basis for claiming that we have discovered a truly existing phenomenon. The only question is, *is it really the one we were expecting*? [My Emphasis] Why on earth is that the "only question"? What does that even mean? I can think of many many questions and that isn't one of them: * What is the mechanism that associates the radiation to the earth movement * Are other objects on earth also affected? * How can we use this to predict quakes?