4 ms·
Consider how an atomic bomb requires relatively little energy input compared to what is released. Combined with how very little practical observation we have of
by CodeWriter23 3y ago
Consider how an atomic bomb requires relatively little energy input compared to what is released. Combined with how very little practical observation we have of what's really going on in the Earth's core. It is certainly possible some phenomena is in play with Earthquakes.
- jjk166 3y agoAtomic bombs don't simply assemble themselves naturally though.
- dotnet00 3y agoNot exactly atomic bombs, but we do have evidence of naturally occurring, self sustaining nuclear reactors having operated for potentially hundreds of thousands of years in Earth's past (https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Natural_nuclear_fission_reactor https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Natural_nuclear_fission_reactor)
- jjk166 3y agoYes, and there is a nuclear fusion reactor above our heads right now, but that is similarly irrelevant when talking about bomb self-assembly.
- dotnet00 3y agoThat's a fair point, I just thought the natural fission reactors were cool while completely forgetting the one in the sky responsible for my ability to think that haha
- CodeWriter23 3y agoI know. Are you suggesting we have already discovered everything there is to know about our planet / this universe?
- jjk166 3y agoI'm suggesting we know enough to rule out the spontaneous self assembly of nuclear bombs. And there's probably a few other things we can rule out by the same logic.