4 ms·
"weapons" should be missing the "s" to reduce ambiguity in that case. Right now it reads like (weapons) and (facial recognition). "weapons recognition" doesn't
by piperswe 3y ago
"weapons" should be missing the "s" to reduce ambiguity in that case. Right now it reads like (weapons) and (facial recognition). "weapons recognition" doesn't quite sound right to me.
- DonaldPShimoda 3y ago> Right now it reads like (weapons) and (facial recognition). That's because that is what it says. The parent comment's confusion was due to both parsing the comma as a list separator instead of a conjunction as well as not recognizing the implication of the "s" at the end of "weapons".
- piperswe 3y agoOh. Ignore me then, I'm just misinterpreting everything.