6 ms·
I think it revolves around the fact that these days we can afford to go hi-fi and seek something like finesse at nearly everything. THis is usually a sign of f
by yason 15y ago
I think it revolves around the fact that these days we can afford to go hi-fi and seek something like finesse at nearly everything.
THis is usually a sign of filling some sort of a void because one needs to have the time, motivation, and energy to narrow yourself down in the array of products and options.
Some time ago, nobody could care less about the taste of water. It was just great if you got it from the tap and you didn't die of it, and even greater if you also got hot water from the same outlet. Water was water and the more pure and clean it was the less it tasted. Water doesn't in itself taste of anything.
Some time ago, nobody could care less about which make, model, or brand your car was. If you owned a car in the first place, that was in itself remarkable. Maybe there were cheap cars and expensive cars, but as far as everyone was concerned just about any car was more convenient than horse wagons or walking.
It's no longer like that.
At some point of your life you buy your first stereo set. If you keep thinking about it, you'll probably upgrade to basic hi-fi loudspeakers and amplifier later. Unless the price ranges become too high for you, you will probably go through a few iterations of more and more expensive equipment that you each time consider a bit better choice for your audiophilic needs.
Depending on your financial situation and what matters to you most, you go hi-fi with some areas in your life and stay at a basic level with other areas. It can be it gardening tools, computers, biking gear, hiking gear, cars, power tools, mobile devices, clothes and fashion, restaurants and cuisine, hobbies, sports, ordering your latte in a coffee shop, or just about whatever you happen to get into.
For a lot of people in western economies, that is so. We can afford to distinguish ourselves and our appearance in search for who we are, and because who you are is a major question for everyone it is a huge void to fill. Pour in the brands and fool yourself to think there's a difference!
At one extreme, some people can be really anxious about their choices and it seems as if their identity fumbles down into pieces if they could only find a bottle of San Pellegrino instead of Perrier. Most people stick with something and try to rationalize it away to avoid constant reconsideration of their choices and thus, their identity. I'm a Perrier man because it's the most original water. Or a Marlboro man. Or I drive a BMW because it allegedly has the best technology that gives me the best drive. Or I chose my headphones because Sennheiser gives the cleanest sound.
At the other extreme, there are people who have some sort of innate balance about themselves and somehow they manage their lives without paying much, if any, attention to what water they drink, what car they drive, or what clothes they wear. And when they do decide to choose something, they understand the irrational and almost comical nature of their preferences. Some people can recognize tastes between different waters. Some people do, yet they decide it doesn't matter.
- SuperChihuahua 15y agoThe Swedish name for a "digital nomad" is "Grötentreprenör" or "Porridge Entrepreneur" = need to break the habit of spending money on stuff you don't really need :)
- batista 15y agoI think it revolves around the fact that these days we can afford to go hi-fi and seek something like finesse at nearly everything. THis is usually a sign of filling some sort of a void because one needs to have the time, motivation, and energy to narrow yourself down in the array of products and options. Some time ago, nobody could care less about the taste of water. It was just great if you got it from the tap and you didn't die of it, and even greater if you also got hot water from the same outlet. Water was water and the more pure and clean it was the less it tasted. Water doesn't in itself taste of anything. Actually, in a lot of countries, the water of old was much better than anything sold in bottles. People had access to clean spring water --something that now costs $$$ to buy bottled. Same for fruit/vegatables: there was a time (not that far for my country, around 30-40 years back), that you could find everywhere stuff that you have to know pay top dollar for as "organic".
- JoeAltmaier 15y agoI don't know what people or communities those were. Most of us around the world were stuck with whatever water was at hand. Springs are actually pretty dang scarce, thus valued and fought over through history. Fruits and vegetables are an order of magnitude cheaper, now that the yields have quintupled and growing seasons been extended thanks to science. Organics maybe aren't any more expensive than all the food was then, I don't know.
- batista 15y agoI don't know what people or communities those were. Most of us around the world were stuck with whatever water was at hand. Springs are actually pretty dang scarce, thus valued and fought over through history. Well, you just haven't lived in any mountainous area with lots of springs then. Tons of places in Europe are like that (and of course elsewhere). Did you have huge plains or vast deserts in mind? For your part of the world, I don't think, say, the guys at the Appalachian had much difficulty getting top notch water. Fruits and vegetables are an order of magnitude cheaper, now that the yields have quintupled and growing seasons been extended thanks to science. Organics maybe aren't any more expensive than all the food was then, I don't know. Well, try any rural village in Southern Europe re: fruits and vegetables. Local produce was more like free. They main problem was getting stuff made abroad/out of season, but you didn't do that, you adjusted your cooking accordingly. That's how local cuisines developed in the first place.