3 ms·
No-one would call Zelda an ARPG. You just need to live with the fact that the term has come to mean something else.
by Kiro 3y ago
No-one would call Zelda an ARPG. You just need to live with the fact that the term has come to mean something else.
- cubefox 3y agoZelda II even had experience points, and Wikipedia counts all the other games I named as ARPGs. There is no way in which Diablo was the first ARPG. Edit: Maybe the influence of Diablo is more that it effectively ended the era of Western/PC turn-based RPGs. For Japanese RPGs, turn-based (non-action) RPGs did hang on for longer, e.g. in form of Final Fantasy.
- Sakos 3y agoFact of the matter is that ARPG today generally means a Diablo-like game. It defined the genre that we know today as ARPGs. You can name other games ARPGs if you want, but it has nothing to do with Diablo or the genre that Diablo defined. I'm not sure why this sort of thing is so difficult to understand.
- cubefox 3y agoPretty much all modern Open World RPGs have real time combat and are therefore called action RPGs, e.g. by Wikipedia. But a game like Elden Ring doesn't seem to me particularly Diablo-like.
- Sakos 3y agoYou're still missing the point. I've explained it to you. Not much else I can do.
- lostmsu 3y ago> Fact of the matter is that ARPG today generally means a Diablo-like game "Fact of the matter is that tree today generally means a birch-like plant"