3 ms·
I've already read the same fallacy in several replies. Why would Apple have to supoort the (supposed, not true in my opinion) complexity of any operating system
by j1elo 3y ago
I've already read the same fallacy in several replies. Why would Apple have to supoort the (supposed, not true in my opinion) complexity of any operating system on their platform? They wouldn't!!! It would be Arch's job to be able to work properly on the hardware.
I don't understand why everybody is assuming that Apple leaving the door open for people with advanced tech knowledge to install alternative software, would mean that Apple has to provide supoort for that software to run properly.
- sbuk 3y agoI actually agree with this. This is the status quo on Silicon Macs. But let's not pretend that there will be untold levels of caterwauling when Apple choose not to document any of it. Also, in my experience, the majority of people with "advanced tech knowledge" (that is as iky as the phrase "power user") are exactly those who I'd want to keep out. They'd likely be the ones doing stupid things for their friends and family to make the device "better" (read "work how they want it to).