3 ms·
Its funny, this person writes a poorly proofread article (while actually expecting people to pay for it) and then puts nuggets with completely unsubstantiated j
by ramraj07 3y ago
Its funny, this person writes a poorly proofread article (while actually expecting people to pay for it) and then puts nuggets with completely unsubstantiated judgement but still wants to weasel out some image of being logical and objective about it. The Berkeley professors are “clearly leftist and should be ignored”, except for the one cherry picked nugget that supports your argument for the day? What’s the point of that statement? Who’s the political whack job, the person making a point with data or the person trying their level best to disregard the data because it’s from a leftist?
What’s with arguments like this becoming popular anyway? Should we be worried about it?
- bbor 3y agoI loved that part! “He says he has done studies proving that rich people are mean, which is clearly wrong because he’s biased. But this is proof that people from different cultural/socioeconomic backgrounds I don’t like are broken!”
- AlbertCory 3y ago> poorly proofread article (while actually expecting people to pay for it) what's an example of an error that proofreading would have caught? And your comment uses "cherry picked" which needs a hyphen: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cherry-pick https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cherry-pick "still wants to weasel out some image of being logical" isn't even good English. As for "expecting people to pay for it" -- you didn't pay, did you? In fact, no one did. I don't have a paid subscription plan.